lm-double-shapeSausser Summers, PC

Providing U.S. trademark services throughout the U.S. and across the globe.
  • Lower Cost
  • Faster Process
  • Experienced Trademark Attorneys

File a Trademark for $399 + $250 Government Filing Fee

Trademark Attorney Working With Clients in Plymouth, Devon

If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the U.S. can be expensive and arduous.

This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.

So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in Plymouth, Devon.

At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with U.S. trademark filing, U.S. trademark responses, and U.S. trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.

Resources

Sausser Summers, PC: Simplifying the U.S. Trademark Process

Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.

Using a trademark attorney for filing in Plymouth, Devon, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The U.S. government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.

At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.

In terms of filing a U.S. trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:

1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.

2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the U.S. Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.

3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your U.S. trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.

The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Online Trademark Attorney Plymouth, Devon
The bottom line?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Do I Really Need a Trademark Attorney for Protecting My Business in Plymouth, Devon?

It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.

The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.

Additional Benefits of Using a Trademark Attorney

Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:

Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.

Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.

Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.

Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.

Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.

Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.

Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.

 Online Trademark Lawyer Plymouth, Devon

Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.

What About Online Filing Services?

Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in Plymouth, Devon.

 Trademark Attorney Plymouth, Devon

Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.

In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.

For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.

Understanding Trademarks Over Time

Trademarks in the U.S. can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in Plymouth, Devon can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.

The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.

 Trademark Law Firm Plymouth, Devon

Steps to Renew Your Trademark

Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.

During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.

After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.

It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.

By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in Plymouth, Devon, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Abandonment

In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Inappropriate Licensing

In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.

How to Avoid Having to Refile Your Trademark

If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.

To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.

It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.

Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.

 Trademark Lawyer Plymouth, Devon
 Trademark Firm Plymouth, Devon

What Makes an Online Trademark Attorney Great?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.

It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.

When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.

Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.

In summary:

  • Be sure you're using a licensed trademark attorney helping clients in Plymouth, Devon.
  • It's best to work with a trademark lawyer who has years of experience filing trademarks.
  • Ensure that your trademark lawyer is willing to provide ongoing notifications relating to your trademark application process.
 Trademark Registration Lawyer Plymouth, Devon

Trademark Attorneys Working Hard for You

Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.

With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.

If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.

Latest News in Plymouth, Devon

Heartbreak as Plymouth dogs left in appalling condition

A Plymouth man who neglected two dogs has been banned from keeping animals for seven years.Kerys Glynn Moore, 28 and from Tamerton Foliot Road, Plymouth, Devon was prosecuted after RSPCA inspectors discovered his two dogs in appalling condition. The animal welfare brought the case and Moore was found guilty following a short hearing on September 26 which he failed to attend.Plymouth Magistrates' Court heard how two crossbreed dogs were rescued from Moore's home by inspectors from the RSPCA. Both were struggling with their healt...

A Plymouth man who neglected two dogs has been banned from keeping animals for seven years.

Kerys Glynn Moore, 28 and from Tamerton Foliot Road, Plymouth, Devon was prosecuted after RSPCA inspectors discovered his two dogs in appalling condition. The animal welfare brought the case and Moore was found guilty following a short hearing on September 26 which he failed to attend.

Plymouth Magistrates' Court heard how two crossbreed dogs were rescued from Moore's home by inspectors from the RSPCA. Both were struggling with their health and not getting the care they needed.

Marley was extremely thin and had a large grapefruit size growth on the side of his back left leg.

Ollie, a larger tan crossbreed dog, was in very thin bodily condition and had a skin complaint to the back and hindquarters.

In their report, the vet who examined the dogs said: "Marley was underweight weighing 15 kilograms with a body condition score of two out of nine, a healthy weight would be four, as well as some dental disease

"He had a large subcutaneous mass approximately 12 centimetres by 12 centimetres with ulceration on the surface.

"Ollie was presented with a weight of 18 kilograms and his body condition score also of two out of nine. His coat was poor with areas of hair loss.

"Both animals presented failed to show freedom from hunger as their diet was not providing adequate nutrition to provide full health. This could have been avoided by feeding an adequate nutritional balanced diet."

On October 17 Moore was sentenced at Plymouth Magistrates Court. Alongside the animal disqualification order, which he cannot appeal for four years, he was also ordered to pay an £80 fine and £200 costs. He was also ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £32.

Preventing animals suffering

This means enforcement agencies and the RSPCA's inspectors can now act by advising and educating owners before their pets suffer. If this advice is not followed or the animal's needs are not being met then action can be taken whether through a formal warning or in some cases a prosecution.

Section 9 of the Animal Welfare Act places a duty of care on people to ensure they take reasonable steps in all the circumstances to meet the welfare needs of their animals to the extent required by good practice.

Find out what your pet needs on the RSPCA's advice and welfare pages.

Click here to join PlymouthLive on WhatsApp and we'll send breaking news and top stories directly to your phone. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Popular Plymouth restaurant hit with zero hygiene rating

A Plymouth restaurant has received a zero hygiene rating and been told that “urgent improvement is necessary". Trattoria Capri on Southside Street was given the lowest rating by inspectors from Plymouth City Council, but the owner has said they’ve already “made changes”.A full inspection was carried out at the ...

A Plymouth restaurant has received a zero hygiene rating and been told that “urgent improvement is necessary". Trattoria Capri on Southside Street was given the lowest rating by inspectors from Plymouth City Council, but the owner has said they’ve already “made changes”.

A full inspection was carried out at the Barbican restaurant on 13 September 2024 and it was found that major urgent improvement was necessary with regards to the cleanliness and condition of facilities and building, as well as the management of food safety.

Inspectors also deemed improvement was necessary when it comes to the restaurant’s hygienic handling of food including preparation, cooking, re-heating, cooling and storage.

The hygiene inspectors also reported that “major improvement” was necessary in the restaurant’s management of food safety. This included system or checks in place to ensure that food sold or served is safe to eat and evidence that staff know about food safety.

One of the owner’s of Trattoria Capri has said they have “already made improvements” and are “waiting for inspectors to return”. The restaurant will be inspected again within a few months and the owner is “waiting for a new rating”.

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS), overseen by the FSA, has been designed to help customers choose where to eat out or shop for food by telling them how seriously the business takes their food hygiene standards. The scheme is run by local authorities in England, Northern Ireland and Wales and applies to restaurants, pubs, cafes, takeaways, hotels, supermarkets and other food shops.

If a premises is rated a five, the hygiene standards are very good, a four means the hygiene standards are good. The score of a three from a hygiene visit means standards are generally satisfactory.

Receiving a two in a hygiene rating means some improvement is necessary and the score of a one deems major improvement necessary, if a premises receives a zero rating then urgent improvement is required.

FSA states that food businesses must ensure they have a ‘system or checks in place to ensure that food sold or served is safe to eat’. FSA also states that food businesses should follow the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) guidelines.

You can read the full hygiene report (from September 13 2024) for Trattoria Capri here.

Click here to join PlymouthLive on WhatsApp and we'll send breaking news and top stories directly to your phone. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice

Devon has the most 'spooky streets' in the UK

From Coffins Lane to Witch Lane, Devon has the most spookily-named roads in the UK, according to the results of a new study. According to 20 percent of Brits, the annual celebration of Halloween - with all of its costumes, sweet treats, parties and scary attractions - is their favourite time of year.Studies show that street names can have a huge impact on the perception of properties and local areas. With that in mind, buildings and contents insurance specialists ...

From Coffins Lane to Witch Lane, Devon has the most spookily-named roads in the UK, according to the results of a new study. According to 20 percent of Brits, the annual celebration of Halloween - with all of its costumes, sweet treats, parties and scary attractions - is their favourite time of year.

Studies show that street names can have a huge impact on the perception of properties and local areas. With that in mind, buildings and contents insurance specialists Homeprotect analysed the Find My Street database to discover how many spooky roads could be found in each local area.

Devon is the county with the most spooky roads, with 80 eerily-named addresses overall. This consisted of 19 street names that contain the word moon, 23 containing grave, 14 with coffin, eight containing dark, four with dead, three with spider, two with bat or headless, and one containing goblin, lantern, cobweb, devil or blood.

Spooky names don’t necessarily mean the roads are haunted, however. Devon is also home to one of the UK’s most haunted highways. The B3212 between Dunsford and Yelverton in Dartmoor is where there have been reports of hairy hands terrorising motorists.

But if it is a spooky experience you are seeking, Devon does have several haunted places you can visit, such as Okehampton Castle and Score Chapel in Ilfracombe.

Yorkshire came in second place with 77 spooky roads such as Dead Mans Hole Lane in Sheffield and Half Moon Way in Sharow. The most popular spooky word is dark which featured 37 times.

While there are no Yorkshire roads that contain the word wolf, the B1249 between Driffield and Staxton Hill in East Riding is associated with werewolves. According to local reports, in the 1960s a lorry driver came across a mythical beast while driving along the country road.

With 58 overall, Cambridgeshire is the third county with the spookiest street names, such as Ghost Passage in Wisbech and Wolf Lane in Gorefield. Meanwhile, Somerset is the fourth county with the most spooky street names and Dorset and Norfolk are joint-fifth spookiest, with 54 and 40 spooky roads each, respectively.

Cornwall also appears on the list. In tenth place, the county has 34 spooky roads you might or might not dare to Trick or Treat on this October 31.

Warehouse partially collapsed after huge fire broke out in Plympton

A factory has partially collapsed after a huge fire broke out at the Langage Business Park in Plympton overnight. Firefighters rushed to the blaze at around 10.20pm on Tuesday night and battled flames through the early hours of this morning.As of 8am today (Wednesday, October 30) fire engines were still at the scene. Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service said the fire spread rapidly, "quickly engulfing the whole building" and ending with a "partial collapse"."This incident is still ongoing but has ...

A factory has partially collapsed after a huge fire broke out at the Langage Business Park in Plympton overnight. Firefighters rushed to the blaze at around 10.20pm on Tuesday night and battled flames through the early hours of this morning.

As of 8am today (Wednesday, October 30) fire engines were still at the scene. Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service said the fire spread rapidly, "quickly engulfing the whole building" and ending with a "partial collapse".

"This incident is still ongoing but has been scaled back to two fire appliances and an aerial ladder platform," the service said in a statement. "The company was closed at the time of call and we are happy to report there were no casualties. The cause of the fire has yet to be confirmed as crews are still damping down and monitoring hotspots."

This is a live blog. Scroll below for more updates throughout the day.

17:52Jamie Hawkins

Staff at a Langage firm have been left counting the costs after a devastating fire ripped through their building during the night.

Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service said they received multiple calls from the public regarding the large fire at the Survitec Group building on Tuesday evening at around 10.20pm. Three appliances and an aerial latter were mobilised from Plympton, Crownhill and Greenbank stations.

Read the full story here.

17:51Jamie Hawkins

11:24Shannon Brown

In an update at 8am, DSFR said:

This is a large scale incident involving a factory/warehouse which spread quickly engulfing the whole building and eventually has ended up with a partial collapse. Crews worked through the night to prevent the fire from spreading to adjacent industrial units, mainly using 2 aerial ladder platforms with monitoring hose reel jets from above the fire, together with crews firefighting on the ground level. This incident is still ongoing but has been scaled back to 2 fire appliances and an aerial ladder platform. The company was closed at the time of call and we are happy to report there were no casualties. The cause of the fire has yet to be confirmed as crews are still damping down and monitoring hotspots.

11:24Jamie Hawkins

Click here to join PlymouthLive on WhatsApp and we'll send breaking news and top stories directly to your phone. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

11:23Shannon Brown

DSFR said in a statement:

Multiple calls were received from members of the public reporting a large fire at a warehouse on Langage Business Park in Plympton yesterday evening. Initially, 3 pumping appliances and an aerial ladder platform were mobilised from our Plympton, Crownhill and Greenbank stations in Plymouth. However within minutes of arriving the attendance was immediately increased by a further 3 pumping appliances attending from Crownhill, Greenbank and Camels Head stations (again all Plymouth stations) together with supporting appliances and later relief crews attending from Totnes, Torquay, Ivybridge, Newton Abbot, Ashburton, Princetown, Bere Alston, Okehampton and Buckfastleigh.

Devon firefighter's 'shaving and drinking' claim dismissed

An on-call operational firefighter from Devon has lost a claim that not being called out amounts to 'working time'. Additionally, stipulations such as not consuming alcohol, needing to shave, and restrictions on hair dye were acknowledged as constraints but deemed not significantly restrictive.The Exeter employment tribunal judge explained in the ruling: "I do not seek to underestimate or devalue the inconvenience that is from time to time caused to the Claimant and his family by him being on-call, nor the sacrifices he makes to ...

An on-call operational firefighter from Devon has lost a claim that not being called out amounts to 'working time'. Additionally, stipulations such as not consuming alcohol, needing to shave, and restrictions on hair dye were acknowledged as constraints but deemed not significantly restrictive.

The Exeter employment tribunal judge explained in the ruling: "I do not seek to underestimate or devalue the inconvenience that is from time to time caused to the Claimant and his family by him being on-call, nor the sacrifices he makes to provide this important service to his local community (albeit on a paid basis)."

"I have concluded that during his on-call shifts, the constraints imposed on the Claimant by the Respondent are not such as to affect, objectively and very significantly, the possibility for him to freely manage the time during which he was not on call-outs and to pursue his own interests."

Andrew Tidd, the firefighter at the centre of the case, serves as an on-call crew manager for the Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service in Modbury, South Devon, and has been with the service since 2013.

The hearing brought out details about the nature of on-call work; while firefighters like Mr Tidd receive 'availability pay' when theyre on standby without being called, they earn 'activity pay' during call-outs.

It was also highlighted that on-call teams manning 99 of the total 112 fire appliances underline the scale of reliance on such firefighters who must adhere to a five-minute response time, reports Devon Live.

On-call firefighters are required to remain sober, have cleanly shaven faces for the safe fitting of breathing gear, and refrain from dyeing their hair while on duty.

Mr Tidd, a clock and watch repairer, expressed that his work was impacted as he had to stay within a five-minute response radius, which also affected his ability to shop, socialise, and attend his twins' school events unless he could arrange cover or take leave when others were available.

He also mentioned that he couldn't engage in running, fishing, or participate with his local drama group during his on-call hours due to the possibility of being called out.

Mr Tidd said in a 45 week period until June 2024 there were 57 incident reports and he went out on a fire engine on 31 occasions and went to the fire station on four other occasions.

The barrister representing Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service highlighted that the case's outcome could significantly affect the national operation of fire services, which depend on on-call firefighters.

The tribunal judge acknowledged: "I accept that the Respondent did place constraints on the Claimant in respect of drinking alcohol, needing to be shaven and his hair style during his on-call shifts."

However, the judge concluded: "I do not conclude that these constraints had 'very significant' impacts on his ability to freely manage his time and pursue his own interests during his on-call period."

"Having to have shaved within the last 24 hours is not, objectively such an onerous undertaking as to impact significantly on someone's ability to manage their time freely nor is having to keep hair styled/coloured in such a way as not to undermine public confidence."

"I accept that not being able to drink alcohol has some objective impact on how a person might pursue their interests, however, it does not prevent them from pursuing those interests at all or, for example, spending time with friends and family socialising."

The judge noted Mr Tidd was summoned less than once a week during 2023-2024, and for 97% of his time on call, he could engage in personal activities provided he remained close to the fire station.

A spokesperson for Devon and Somerset FRS expressed satisfaction with the hearing's outcome: "We're pleased with the findings of the hearing as the alternative would have hugely impacted on our ability to provide a fire and rescue service to our communities. We rely on on-call firefighters, and we appreciate and thank them for the commitment they give to serve our communities."

Disclaimer:

This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.