If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the U.K. can be expensive and arduous.
This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.
So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in Portsmouth, Hampshire.
At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with U.K. trademark filing, U.K. trademark responses, and U.K. trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.
Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.
Using a trademark attorney for filing in Portsmouth, Hampshire, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The U.K. government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.
In terms of filing a U.K. trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:
1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.
2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the U.K. Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.
3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your U.K. trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.
The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the U.K. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.
The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.
Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:
Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.
Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.
Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.
Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.
Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.
Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.
Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.
Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.
Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in Portsmouth, Hampshire.
Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.
In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.
For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.
Trademarks in the U.K. can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in Portsmouth, Hampshire can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.
The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.
Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.
During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.
After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.
It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.
By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in Portsmouth, Hampshire, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.
In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.
In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.
If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.
To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.
It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.
Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.
It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.
When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.
Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.
In summary:
Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.
With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.
If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.
A Portsmouth garage is celebrating after being named the best independent servicing & MOT garage in Hampshire.Nicholas Buck was taken aback when his Atlanta Garage in Stamshaw was named as the winner at the Corporate Vision’s Automative Awards last month. The garage has been running for around six years and has built a loyal customer base with one of them putting its name forward for the award.Nicholas said: “It’s a nice thing to get that recognition as it backs up that you are doing a good job. We ...
A Portsmouth garage is celebrating after being named the best independent servicing & MOT garage in Hampshire.
Nicholas Buck was taken aback when his Atlanta Garage in Stamshaw was named as the winner at the Corporate Vision’s Automative Awards last month. The garage has been running for around six years and has built a loyal customer base with one of them putting its name forward for the award.
Nicholas said: “It’s a nice thing to get that recognition as it backs up that you are doing a good job. We got nominated by one of our customers. We then had some phone calls back and forth with the awards company and we were up against some of the really big places.”
Despite the stiff competition from across the county, the Portsmouth garage came out on top with Nicholas and his team’s customer service being heralded.
Nicholas said: “What they really liked about us is our focus on customer services and we are not that big a garage. It is really important for us to have that customer focus and we have lot of loyal customers. I would say about 90 per cent of our customers come back so we see the same people.
“Everyone knows that we go above and beyond, we really do and we try to help people out and people appreciate it.”
While the award is great recognition for Nicholas, he emphasised the huge role his team has played in the success of the business with Cliff Hopwood, Alfie Watt, Marcus Ponter and Jo Buck all embodying the customer first approach.
Nicholas said: “The team are all the reason we got the award and have returning customers. They all deserve the credit.”
Portsmouth City Council has signed off plans for a combined authority covering Hampshire to Parliament for approval.The council’s cabinet members were the last of the four upper-tier councils across the county to sign off plans for the government’s devolution agenda.Devolution involves the transfer of powers and resources from Westminster to local communities, such as in London and Greater Manchester.Locally, there are plans for a combined authority comprising Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, which would have...
Portsmouth City Council has signed off plans for a combined authority covering Hampshire to Parliament for approval.
The council’s cabinet members were the last of the four upper-tier councils across the county to sign off plans for the government’s devolution agenda.
Devolution involves the transfer of powers and resources from Westminster to local communities, such as in London and Greater Manchester.
Locally, there are plans for a combined authority comprising Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, which would have an elected mayor from May 2028.
Elections were supposed to take place this year, but were delayed. As a result, the combined authority would be led in partnership between the county’s four upper-tier authorities until the mayoral elections.
The authorities include Portsmouth City Council, Southampton City Council, Hampshire County Council and the Isle of Wight Council.
All four authorities have given the green light to the proposal, with Portsmouth being the last to do so yesterday.
Councillor Steve Pitt, leader of the council, described the decision as “momentous” for the county as it’s “the first time that all the upper tier authorities have approved a plan”.
The plan, or statutory instrument, will be sent to the government, which will lay it before Parliament. If Parliament approves it, then the new authority would be set up at that stage – likely to be somewhere between six and ten weeks, plus parliamentary recess times.
Officers said failure to take the opportunity now “would likely to be to the detriment of Portsmouth with less funding available and any future devolution offers likely to be far less generous”.
Councillor Darren Sanders, cabinet member for housing and tackling homelessness, said: “This is going to be Britain’s sixth biggest devolved body – more than many other parts of the country that are more famous than this area.
“Devolution is incredibly important, getting power out of London means economies are better, means communities are more in control.
“Residents want to feel more in control of their lives – this is one way of doing that.”
Council reports state that the proposals would give the authority extra powers, including the option to introduce a visitor levy if approved through a national government consultation.
They would also open up access to more funding to support growth, as the new combined authority will be in receipt of £1.3bn over 32 years, and increase representation at a national level, including in the Council of Nations.
The changes are expected to strengthen working between councils and government, placing the area in the first wave of Mayoral Combined County Authorities.
Devolution is different from Local Government Reorganisation, which is another Labour government agenda that aims to replace the county-district tier system of local government with large unitary authorities.
A brave Romsey performance was not enough to keep a strong United Sevices Portsmouth side at bay. A blustery sunny day at the historic Portsmouth ground offered Romsey the chance to close the mid table points gap on their hosts, writes Peter Jones.There was a clear statement of intent from USP in the first minute of the game as they spun the ball wide, bringing their hard running back row forwards into the game straight away. Romsey’s scramble defence stopped their momentum and this set the pattern for the afternoon.After...
A brave Romsey performance was not enough to keep a strong United Sevices Portsmouth side at bay. A blustery sunny day at the historic Portsmouth ground offered Romsey the chance to close the mid table points gap on their hosts, writes Peter Jones.
There was a clear statement of intent from USP in the first minute of the game as they spun the ball wide, bringing their hard running back row forwards into the game straight away. Romsey’s scramble defence stopped their momentum and this set the pattern for the afternoon.
After just ten minutes however Romsey established a platform close the the USP line and a clever move at the front of a lineout led to Alfie Lawrence being driven over to open the scoring. Stung into action, USP’s scrum half took a quick tap penalty and the Romsey defence could not contain the strong running blindside flanker and the scores were level.
Romsey’s brave work at the breakdown frustrated the hosts for much of the first half until a sustained series of attacks broke through their tackles and USP went into the interval 12-5 ahead.
USP came out of the break determined to drive home their advantage, and early pressure from the kick off led to a scoring drive by their forwards. Now two tries adrift, it was crucial that Romsey score next to stay in the game, but they failed to capitalise on possession deep in the USP half. A breakout quickly turned into a try, and with Romsey heads dropping, another score meant that USP had a bonus point and a 29-5 lead.
A succession of injuries and some indiscipline from both sides meant that the crowd’s hopes of a free running game were thwarted, although USP did manage to rub salt in the wound with an interception try in the last quarter. Sadly, a flowing Romsey move ended frustratingly short of the USP line in the very last play of the game. The final score was a sobering 43-5.
Jason Berry’s side were left with much to think about as they made their return trip down the M27. The pack had performed well at scrum time - particularly considering several changes of personnel - and they were more than a match for USP at the breakdown. Problems in the line out meant that they could not establish a toe hold in the game and they were ultimately outgunned by some strong running from the opposition back row. They will be keen to bounce back at Ganger Farm next Saturday March 7 as they entertain local rivals Southampton RFC. Kick off is at 3pm.
Sheffield United manager Chris Wilder praised his team’s mentality after seeing them win 1-0 at Portsmouth thanks to a last-minute goal from Andre Brooks.Portsmouth were the dominant side throughout the first half but Wilder said his players were rewarded for their resilience with a first away win in six games after Brooks slid in to convert Tyrese Campbell’s cross at the far post in the 90th minute.Wilder said: “Sometimes games are won on mentality. You can’t always play well. We played well on Monday a...
Sheffield United manager Chris Wilder praised his team’s mentality after seeing them win 1-0 at Portsmouth thanks to a last-minute goal from Andre Brooks.
Portsmouth were the dominant side throughout the first half but Wilder said his players were rewarded for their resilience with a first away win in six games after Brooks slid in to convert Tyrese Campbell’s cross at the far post in the 90th minute.
Wilder said: “Sometimes games are won on mentality. You can’t always play well. We played well on Monday against arguably the best team in the division (Middlesbrough).
“The art of what you need to do is when you’re not at your best, which we weren’t, is that you have to rely on your mentality. If we weren’t together, then we’d have been rolled over.”
The win sees the Blades climb to within six points of the play-offs but Wilder refused to be drawn on talks of a push for promotion.
He said: “It’s the next game. You win games of football, you go up the division. If we were 24th, I’d want to be 23rd. If we were 10th, I’d want to be ninth. And if we were top, I’d want to be top by 10 points. So that’s our attitude. We’re not top.”
The game saw midfielder Kalvin Phillips start a match for the first time since last March after he joined the club on loan from Manchester City in the winter transfer window.
Commenting on his performance, Wilder said: “He was great. He should have only done about 60 minutes, but he ended up doing 85 minutes, which I think tells a lot about what he’s like as a lad.
“His target at Manchester City was to try and move Rodri, who was the Ballon d’Or winner. That’s quite a difficult one. He’s a good kid, he just wants to play football.”
Portsmouth finished the day in 21st place, one point and one place above the relegation zone, albeit with two games in hand on the teams around them.
Manager John Mousinho admitted that his team had paid for not taking their chances when they were in the ascendancy in the first half.
He said: “I thought the first half we were really dominant, very good performance, but we didn’t show enough composure in front of goal and slashed at a couple of opportunities.
“It was a slightly different game in the second half, but I thought once we got to grips with it, we looked more likely to win in the last 20, 25 minutes and unfortunately got caught on the break.
“Every game from now until the end of the season is going to be massive. The next one is the biggest one.”
Hampshire County Council’s £354 million deficit for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) support is set to be largely paid off after confirmation of a multi-billion-pound Government rescue package.The Government announced it will commit £5 billion to cover 90 per cent of SEND-related deficits built up by all councils in England up to the end of the current financial year.The move follows warnings from the Local Government Association that eight in 10 councils could effectively face bankruptcy if f...
Hampshire County Council’s £354 million deficit for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) support is set to be largely paid off after confirmation of a multi-billion-pound Government rescue package.
The Government announced it will commit £5 billion to cover 90 per cent of SEND-related deficits built up by all councils in England up to the end of the current financial year.
The move follows warnings from the Local Government Association that eight in 10 councils could effectively face bankruptcy if forced to absorb the mounting shortfalls.
The latest forecast for Southampton City Council’s dedicated schools grant deficit by the end of 2025/26 was £16.54 million, according to a cabinet report published last month.
Hampshire’s deficit is forecast to reach £354 million by March 31, 2026, driven largely by the soaring cost of supporting children and young people with complex needs.
Without Government intervention, the county’s Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) deficit had been projected to exceed £716 million by the time the current statutory accounting override ends in March 2028.
The temporary override has allowed councils to keep high-needs deficits off their main revenue budgets, avoiding an immediate impact on their overall financial position.
In a statement, Hampshire County Council said it welcomed the announcement but cautioned that the funding is neither automatic nor immediate.
A spokesperson for the county council said: “The Government has pledged to cover 90 per cent of the deficits accrued by local councils, which are almost entirely caused by high-needs SEND costs exceeding available funding.
“But the write-off is not automatic as councils must submit a ‘local SEND reform plan’ for approval by the Department for Education, and the timing of when the cash will be received is not yet clear.”
Even with the write-off, Hampshire would still need to find more than £35 million, the remaining 10 per cent of its forecast deficit, from its own resources.
The council warned that it cannot currently afford to meet that cost when the override ends in April 2028. Reserves are already under severe pressure after years of budget gaps and are expected to be exhausted by 2027/28.
Until the Government funding is paid, the authority says it will continue to carry the financial burden itself, losing an estimated £14 million a year in foregone investment income as it underwrites the deficit from its cash balances.
The SEND funding crisis has intensified in recent years, with rising demand for education, health and care plans and increasing placement costs placing sustained strain on council budgets nationwide.