If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the U.K. can be expensive and arduous.
This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.
So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire.
At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with U.K. trademark filing, U.K. trademark responses, and U.K. trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.
Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.
Using a trademark attorney for filing in Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The U.K. government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.
In terms of filing a U.K. trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:
1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.
2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the U.K. Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.
3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your U.K. trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.
The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the U.K. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.
The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.
Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:
Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.
Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.
Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.
Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.
Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.
Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.
Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.
Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.
Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire.
Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.
In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.
For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.
Trademarks in the U.K. can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.
The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.
Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.
During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.
After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.
It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.
By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.
In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.
In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.
If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.
To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.
It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.
Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.
It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.
When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.
Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.
In summary:
Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.
With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.
If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.
Lunar New Year celebrations are returning to Hanley’s cultural quarter this February, as the city celebrates the Chinese year of the horse with a full day of events and activities.The free-of-charge celebrations take place on Sunday 22 February in the Spitfire Gallery at The Potteries Museum & Art Gallery as well as Smithfield, City Central Library and Mitchell Arts Centre.The event will feature traditional music and dance, including dragon and lion performances, alongside kung fu displays, mask changing, acrobatics a...
Lunar New Year celebrations are returning to Hanley’s cultural quarter this February, as the city celebrates the Chinese year of the horse with a full day of events and activities.
The free-of-charge celebrations take place on Sunday 22 February in the Spitfire Gallery at The Potteries Museum & Art Gallery as well as Smithfield, City Central Library and Mitchell Arts Centre.
The event will feature traditional music and dance, including dragon and lion performances, alongside kung fu displays, mask changing, acrobatics and firecrackers.
Visitors will also be able to take part in Chinese craft sessions, circus skills workshops and hands-on activities.
The celebrations come as The Potteries Museum & Art Gallery continues its multi-million-pound transformation, part of a £5m masterplan supported by Arts Council England’s Cultural Development Fund.
“Lunar New Year is always hugely popular in Stoke-on-Trent, so it’s great that we can bring these celebrations back to the city centre this year,” said Cllr Sarah Hill, cabinet member at Stoke-on-Trent City Council.
“We have strong cultural links with China through our ceramics heritage and our partnership with Jingdezhen, China’s porcelain capital.
“This event is a chance to celebrate those connections and share Chinese traditions with residents and visitors.”
She added: “It’s also a celebration of our city’s diversity and creativity.
“Lunar New Year is recognised by UNESCO as part of the world’s intangible cultural heritage and it fits perfectly with our ambition to become a UNESCO creative city.”
The event will run from 11am to 4pm on Sunday 22 February. It is free of charge, although a small charge will apply for the clay activity.
More information is .
Follow So Staffordshire on Facebook, Threads and Instagram, or email staffordshire@so-counties.co.uk with story suggestions and to enquire about advertising opportunities.
Residents, businesses and community organisations across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent are being encouraged to share their views as the Government launches its statutory consultation on local government reorganisation.From bins to bridges, safer streets to social care, councils support daily life across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent. The way local government works in the area could change in the future as part of national proposals to simplify council structures.Under local government reorganisation, Staffordshire’s...
Residents, businesses and community organisations across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent are being encouraged to share their views as the Government launches its statutory consultation on local government reorganisation.
From bins to bridges, safer streets to social care, councils support daily life across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent. The way local government works in the area could change in the future as part of national proposals to simplify council structures.
Under local government reorganisation, Staffordshire’s county, city, district and borough councils would be replaced with a smaller number of new unitary councils delivering all councils services in a given area. Exactly what this will look like will be decided by the Government following consideration of five proposals that have been submitted.
Councillor Steve Thornley, Leader of Cannock Chase Council, has encouraged people to take part in the Government consultation.
“We want to ensure any new council will provide excellent services for the people and the businesses of (Cannock Chase) Stafford Borough. So, if you want to have a say on how council services are delivered in the future, then please take the time to read the information that is available through our dedicated website and then share your views through the Government’s consultation.”
No immediate changes will be made to council services.
The Government is expected to make a decision on local government reorganisation in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent in Summer 2026.
Existing councils will continue to deliver services as normal, with new unitary councils not expected to be in place until April 2028 at the earliest.
The Government’s consultation is now open until Thursday 26 March. People can find out more about the proposals and how to submit their views at www.staffordshirestokeLGR.org.uk
The increase for Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire is far higher than the national averageWater bills across Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire are set to rise by an average of £52 from April - almost twice the national average.Average household water bills across the country will increase by £2.75 a month on April 1, taking the typical bill to £639 a year. That’s an increase of 5.4% according to the industry trade association, Water UK.However, the ...
Water bills across Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire are set to rise by an average of £52 from April - almost twice the national average.
Average household water bills across the country will increase by £2.75 a month on April 1, taking the typical bill to £639 a year. That’s an increase of 5.4% according to the industry trade association, Water UK.
However, the size of the annual increase varies across the country with different water companies increasing their bills by different amounts.
Severn Trent customers will be among the worst hit with a 10 per cent rise. It means the average bill for 2026/7 is expected to be £587 compared to £535 in the current financial year.
At the other end of the scale, Thames Water will only be increasing average bills by £3 a year. That’s the lowest average increase of any company to provide both water and wastewater services.
You can see how much your water company is increasing average bills this year by using our interactive chart:
David Henderson, Water UK Chief Executive, said: “We understand increasing bills is never welcome, but the money is needed to fund vital upgrades to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas.
“While we urgently need investment in our water and sewage infrastructure, we know that for many this increase will be difficult. That is why we will help around 2.5 million households – more than ever before – with average discounts of around 40% off their water bill.”
United Utilities: £57
Southern Water: £55
Hafren Dyfrdwy: £54
Severn Trent Water: £52
Anglian Water: £44
South West Water: £39
Yorkshire Water: £34
Dŵr Cymru (Welsh Water): £31
Northumbrian Water: £31
Affinity Water (Central region): £31
Bristol Water: £29
Sutton & East Surrey Water: £26
South East Water: £21
Wessex Water: £17
Essex and Suffolk Water: £15
Portsmouth Water: £13
Bournemouth Water: £11
South Staffs Water (Cambridge region): £7
South Staffs Water (South Staffs region): £6
Thames Water: £3
Affinity Water (South east region): £3
Affinity Water (East region): £1
Here's a list of the 44 branch closuresBanking giant Santander is closing a Staffordshire branch. The Stafford branch - on Market Square - is one of 44 to be closed across the country.The Santander branch, on Town Road, in Hanley, is unaffected by today's announcement.The announcement puts 291 jobs at risk. It has been made 'in response to changing customer behaviour' as more customers move online to do their banking.Closing branches will be replaced ...
Banking giant Santander is closing a Staffordshire branch. The Stafford branch - on Market Square - is one of 44 to be closed across the country.
The Santander branch, on Town Road, in Hanley, is unaffected by today's announcement.
The announcement puts 291 jobs at risk. It has been made 'in response to changing customer behaviour' as more customers move online to do their banking.
Closing branches will be replaced by a weekly Santander Local service which visits places like libraries or community centres or at Banking Hub counters provided by the Post Office.
A Santander spokesman said: "Approximately 291 colleagues would be placed at risk of redundancy if the proposals proceed after consultation with the unions has been completed, however there will be a number of redeployment opportunities that impacted colleagues can apply for."
Following the changes, the Santander branch network will consist of 305 branches including 244 full-service branches, 19 counter-free branches, 36 reduced-hour branches, and six Work Cafés, alongside 111 Santander Locals.
Santander has seen a rapid increase in customers choosing to do their banking online, with 96% of all transactions now being completed digitally, reports The Mirror.
The business reported a 64% rise in digital transactions since 2019 with financial transactions completed in branches reduced by 66% in the same period. There has been a 13% decrease in the volume of financial transactions happening in bank branches in the last year alone.
The Santander UK spokesman added: "In response to a continuing and sizeable shift towards customers using digital banking, we are making changes to our branches to better support our customers. We will continue to invest in both our branch network - comprising of full-service branches, counter-free branches, reduced-hour branches, Santander Locals, and our increasingly popular Work Cafés – as well as our digital banking services, so we can be there to support our customers however they choose to bank with us."
A £150,000 campaign has been launched to buy the treasure and display it at Hanley's Potteries Museum & Art GalleryRare 3,000-year-old Bronze Age treasure has been discovered in a field in Staffordshire - and now a £150,000 campaign has been launched to keep it in Stoke-on-Trent.The solid gold dress fastener, unearthed by a metal detectorist near Ellastone, between Cheadle and Ashbourne, in 2023, has officially been declared treasure.Now Hanley's Potterie...
Rare 3,000-year-old Bronze Age treasure has been discovered in a field in Staffordshire - and now a £150,000 campaign has been launched to keep it in Stoke-on-Trent.
The solid gold dress fastener, unearthed by a metal detectorist near Ellastone, between Cheadle and Ashbourne, in 2023, has officially been declared treasure.
Now Hanley's Potteries Museum & Art Gallery has until spring 2026 to raise the funds needed to keep it in the area and place it in the public collection.
It is one of the finest examples of its kind ever unearthed and the first to be found in Britain for almost 30 years. Only seven others are recorded across England and Wales. Experts says its exceptional workmanship shows it belonged to someone of very high status.
If acquired it would sit alongside the Staffordshire Hoard and the Leekfrith Torcs as one of the county’s most important archaeological gold finds, adding a new chapter to Staffordshire’s history of exceptional discoveries covering a period of thousands of years.
Councillor Sarah Hill, cabinet member for finance and anti-poverty at Stoke-on-Trent City Council, said: “This discovery, alongside the Staffordshire Hoard and the Leekfrith Torcs, confirms Staffordshire as home to some of the most important gold treasures ever found in the country.
“Securing this piece would strengthen the museum’s offer as it reopens following its multi-million-pound transformation and give visitors yet more reason to come and explore our area’s history.”
Joe Perry, curator of Local History at The Potteries Museum & Art Gallery, said: “This is the most significant item of treasure the museum has been offered for nearly 10 years and the first of its kind to be discovered anywhere in Staffordshire.
“Who exactly used this object, and how it came to be buried, may forever be a mystery, but it’s certain that whoever wore it held very high status in their community.
“To find such a rare class of artefact in the county significantly changes our understanding of the region during the Bronze Age. We are hopeful we can acquire this nationally important artefact to keep it within a publicly accessible collection, close to where it was found.”
A fundraising campaign led by the Friends of the Potteries Museum & Art Gallery has already secured a £60,000 pledge from Art Fund subject to the remaining cash being raised. The Friends aim to raise at least £15,000 from public donations, with the museum submitting bids to external funding bodies to make up the remainder.
Peter Wilson, chair of the Friends of the Potteries Museum & Art Gallery, said: “The Friends have supported the acquisition of a number of local finds, with generous contributions from our members and others.
“We are particularly excited about the dress fastener and welcome the significant offer from Art Fund. We hope that anyone who is able to will help us to keep this very special example of our local history, which will complement the Potteries Museum’s already rich archaeological collections."
If the appeal succeeds, the fastener will be displayed in the museum’s archaeology galleries and be available for research into prehistoric Staffordshire.
The following finds are Treasure under the Treasure Act 1996, if found after 24 September 1997 (or, in the case of category 2, if found after 1 January 2003):
The Treasure Act gives finders a legal obligation to report finds that meet certain criteria, in order to ensure that these are offered to museums for public benefit rather than sold privately.
The law aims to to keep historically important artifacts (especially gold/silver over 300 years old) in the nation, preventing them from being sold privately.
Date of object: 1000 – 800 BCE (Late Bronze Age)
Dress fastener with solid, cast 'bow' or 'handle' ending in two sub-conical terminals. The terminals appear to have been raised from the joining bar or 'bow' (which is circular in cross section and tapers towards the terminal cones) by hammering (planishing) and small hammer marks are visible on the surfaces of both cones. Armbruster (2021, 210) has recently argued that 'handle' or 'bow' of this type of object could have been cast straight until the terminals were hammered/raised before being bent.
There are light scratches (possibly traces of wear) across the body of the object, although these disappear close to the very edge of the terminals, suggesting they were possibly covered during original use (also see Wilde 1862, 60). One side of the bar shows a long burring which appears to be modern in origin. There is no evidence of decoration (some of the largest examples from Ireland are decorated, most notably the Clones, Co. Monaghan dress fastener which weighs 1033g).
Dimensions:
Weight: 108.98g
Maximum length (terminals and bar): 127mm
Diameter of cone/terminal 1: 55.5mm (apex off centre)
Height of cone 1: c.23mm (to joining bar)
Diameter of cone/terminal 2: 55 – 55.5mm
Height of cone 2: c.23mm (to joining bar)
Bar, minimum diameter (at join to terminal): 4mm
Bar, maximum diameter (at mid-point): 8mm
Discussion: This class of artefact can be dated to the Ewart Park phase in Britain and the Ewart/Dowris phase in Ireland through several hoard associations (Davies n.d., 23; Eogan 1994). Eogan (1994, 142-45, fig, 40) records 19 dress fasteners from Britain and 82 from Ireland. I am unaware of any additional British finds made since Eogan published his study in 1994. One additional Irish example has been discovered since 1994, in 2013, in Ballycullen, Co. Dublin (National Museum of Ireland registration number 2013:368) (M. Cahill pers comm.). The Ellastone find is therefore the twentieth of its type and the seventh found in England to date. The geographically closest discoveries were made on the northern side of the Peak District, in North Yorkshire: two found together from ‘near Rippon’ in 1780 and one seemingly found on its own around 1815, near the lodge of Swinton Park (Swinton Estate) which weighed c.164g (Way 1849, 61). There are also single examples from Norfolk, Kent (a terminal/fragment) and Cornwall (Eogan 1994, 142-45). The dimension and weight of the Staffordshire find is very similar to an example from Islay, Scotland, in the collections of the British Museum (registration number 1920,0316.1; https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1920-0316-1)
In terms of function, these objects could have been used to fasten cloth and clothing (Hakwes & Clarke 1963, fig. 52), although in appearance they resemble (and may have been inspired by) contemporary bracelets with expanded terminals.
Other, notable, later Bronze Age finds have been made in close vicinity, including a pair of late style palstaves (Treasure case 2023 T545) of possible Wilburton to Ewart Park date (c.1150-800 BC).
Conclusion: This object is over 300 years old and is made of precious metal (more than 10%). It therefore appears to meet the requirements of the 1996 Treasure Act.