If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the U.S. can be expensive and arduous.
This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.
So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in Derby, Derbyshire.
At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with U.S. trademark filing, U.S. trademark responses, and U.S. trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.
Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.
Using a trademark attorney for filing in Derby, Derbyshire, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The U.S. government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.
In terms of filing a U.S. trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:
1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.
2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the U.S. Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.
3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your U.S. trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.
The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.
The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.
Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:
Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.
Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.
Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.
Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.
Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.
Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.
Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.
Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.
Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in Derby, Derbyshire.
Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.
In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.
For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.
Trademarks in the U.S. can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in Derby, Derbyshire can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.
The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.
Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.
During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.
After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.
It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.
By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in Derby, Derbyshire, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.
In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.
In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.
If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.
To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.
It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.
Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.
It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.
When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.
Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.
In summary:
Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.
With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.
If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.
An historic Derbyshire bank is up for auction with a guide price of £600,000 or more three months after gaining approval for conversion into flats. The former RBS bank in Snitterton Road, Matlock, was granted permission by ...
An historic Derbyshire bank is up for auction with a guide price of £600,000 or more three months after gaining approval for conversion into flats. The former RBS bank in Snitterton Road, Matlock, was granted permission by Derbyshire Dales District Council for conversion into 16 flats.
Now, it is due to be auctioned by SDL Auctions on Thursday, November 21 at 9am with a guide price of £600,000 or more, referring to the site as a “superb investment opportunity”. It details the site will provide eight one-bed apartments ranging from 42-48 square metres and eight two-bed apartments ranging from 71-129 square metres, with “ample” parking space, communal gardens and electric vehicle charging spots.
The advertised auction details that currently part of the grounds are rented out as a car park, bringing in £27,000 a year, with rent of £15,000 per year. Garages are rented for £12,000 a year. Councillors approved plans from Matilda Fraser to turn the historic Grade-II listed former bank, opposite Matlock Bridge, into four flats while 12 further flats would be built in an extension, replacing the existing 1950s extension.
This brought to an end years of to-ing and fro-ing over the prominent site’s future, with previous plans for 22 apartments rejected in 2021 and rebuffed at appeal in 2022. The new design, approved by councillors, would see an extension building featuring a a flat “green” roof with wildflowers, foliage and solar panels, along with swift and bat boxes and a permeable driveway aimed at allowing water to seep through into the ground.
Six of the flats would have balconies and the site would have 14 parking spaces – less than one per flat – with a chunk of the site already sold off to a neighbour to provide them with a rear parking spot. James Boon, agent for the applicants, had said the new design would “help save this historic building” and was a way to find a solution for all involved.
We send out the biggest stories in an email every day. Sign up for the main Derbyshire Live newsletter here.
Residents in a part of Derbyshire are set to be charged for new food waste bins to meet Government plans to separate weekly collections. South Derbyshire District Council, along with all other local councils, is looking at how it can meet Government plans to have separate weekly food waste collections from April 2026.In a new report, the council...
Residents in a part of Derbyshire are set to be charged for new food waste bins to meet Government plans to separate weekly collections. South Derbyshire District Council, along with all other local councils, is looking at how it can meet Government plans to have separate weekly food waste collections from April 2026.
In a new report, the council says it plans to offer kitchen-top caddies to residents at a “reasonable cost” of £3 each, including delivery. It says previous offers of kitchen-top caddies have received a “low uptake” due to people having their own separate bin already.
Meanwhile, it says it will provide households with one free roll of 52 bin bags (costing £2) as an introductory “incentive” after which residents would be charged £2 per roll, including delivery, or choose to purchase them elsewhere. Residents would be provided with a free 20-23 litre external food waste caddy.
Central Government, under plans from the previous Conservative administration, is covering the cost of providing the scheme for the first year as a “transitional” payment, which also gives local councils money towards purchasing new vehicles and hiring extra staff. For South Derbyshire, it expects to spend £200,000 on caddies, £600,000 on eight 7.5-tonne bin lorries, £865,290 on 24 new staff, £18,000 on fuel and £12,000 on maintenance – to a total of £1.7 million.
District council officers say there are two options being considered for collections. Option one is to collect food waste with brown bins – as is the current policy – with no separate collection one week, and then in week two (the week your black general waste bin is collected) to have a second separate collection of the kerbside caddy.
Option two is to have separate kerbside caddy collections each week. District council officers say option one would be cheaper because it would require fewer vehicles and staff but say Derbyshire County Council – which oversees waste management – wants option two so that food waste can be treated by an anaerobic digester.
The district council says anticipated lead-in times for new vehicles will be 6-12 months from orders being placed. Procurement of these vehicles is being progressed and expressions of interest have been requested with suitable suppliers.
They write: “An additional risk to consider will be the pressure on the supply chain as all local authorities that do not currently collect food waste will be looking to procure vehicles over the coming months.” Amber Valley Borough Council has also expressed concern about the competition for vehicles, with all councils to be vying for new resources.
Borough council officers dubbed the move a “most unhelpful” additional pressure on its budget. Amber Valley and Erewash are the only two Derbyshire councils not to recycle food waste at all, while the Derbyshire Dales is the only authority that already offers a separate collection.
Last year, Daniel Ayrton, Derbyshire County Council’s assistant director of resources and waste, said the food waste collections mandate was a “once in a generation opportunity” to make improvements. He suggested the county bid for contracts on behalf of the districts and boroughs, which collect bins, to save on costs and improve efficiency and competition.
We send out the biggest stories in an email every day. Sign up for the main Derbyshire Live newsletter here.
The building of a community swimming pool in Derby is to be upgraded and be given a huge makeover to avoid it closing to the public because of rising energy costs. Derby City Council has approved important plans to protect the future of Lonsdale Swimming Pool in ...
The building of a community swimming pool in Derby is to be upgraded and be given a huge makeover to avoid it closing to the public because of rising energy costs. Derby City Council has approved important plans to protect the future of Lonsdale Swimming Pool in Bishop Lonsdale Way, Mickleover.
According to its website, the pool is used for children’s and adult swimming lessons, local clubs and schools, as well as being open for public swimming sessions. It is operated by charity Lonsdale Swimming and Sports Trust. A planning application was submitted to the council to give the building a fresh and renovated look “to improve the energy efficiency of the building to reduce running costs”.
Permission was sought to over-clad the building and replace its windows and doors to change its appearance and significantly improve its “thermal envelope” and to meet the current building regulations.
Join us on WhatsApp to get the latest news straight to your phone
A design statement on behalf of the trust said: “These works are essential to create an energy efficient building to safeguard its future as a vital community asset. Without the permission for these changes being improved, the likelihood the facility will be able to continue to operate with rising energy costs is very low.
“The proposal for the permission to improve the thermal efficiency of the building, to change its appearance does not cause significant harm to the local context or any heritage assets.”
Last year, it was reported the pool had temporarily closed for around three months due to unforeseen problems and difficulties getting replacement parts. It had been feared at one point by the trustees of the Lonsdale Way pool that it would not reopen at all, especially taking into account the rising cost of running it.
Derby City Council officially approved the plans on October 31. A decision notice from the city council said: “This proposal provides both visual improvements to the appearance of the building, improvements to the thermal efficiency of the building and the opportunity to include micro-generation equipment to off-set the high emery costs associated with the use. As such the proposals accord with all national and local planning policies.
“In dealing with this application the city council has worked with the applicant/agent in a positive and proactive manner and, whilst no amendments to the scheme were necessary in this case, it has been determined in a positive fashion.”
We send out the biggest stories in an email every day. Sign up for the main Derbyshire Live newsletter here.
Major roadworks are taking place on a busy Derby road to help alleviate serious flooding issues in the months and years to come. “Essential” drainage works have started today (Monday, November 4) on Markeaton Lane with the hope that long-term problems can be addressed, especially during the winter and when there are adverse weather conditions.It is understood...
Major roadworks are taking place on a busy Derby road to help alleviate serious flooding issues in the months and years to come. “Essential” drainage works have started today (Monday, November 4) on Markeaton Lane with the hope that long-term problems can be addressed, especially during the winter and when there are adverse weather conditions.
It is understood the work, being led by Derby City Council, could take a few weeks to complete and warnings of traffic disruption have been issued during the course of the works. A completion date has been set for Friday, November 22 but this could change depending on the speed of the project.
It is understood the works will not affect visitors to Markeaton Park and Markeaton Crematorium over the next few weeks as "access will be maintained for residents and businesses at all times". But traffic disruption is expected on surrounding roads.
Join us on WhatsApp to get the latest news straight to your phone
Markeaton Lane is one of Derby's most vulnerable roads for flooding and is often closed following storms. The road connects the Allestree suburb with Mackworth and vice-versa.
Prior to works starting it is understood letters were sent to residents and businesses by city council bosses explaining the reasoning behind the works. But according to Allestree councillor and Derby Mayor Ged Potter, some residents have complained about there being a lack of information prior to the works starting.
Councillors in Allestree say work is also taking place to rebuild a damaged stone-made parapet on one of the road's "sharp bends "which has been "knocked down by drivers".
Overall the works will alleviate flooding issues on the road “which often results in full closures during storm events”. It is hoped the works will improve connectivity for residents, businesses, and visitors going forward, and is an "essential upgrade to the city's infrastructure".
Councillors in Mackworth posted: "We are expecting disruptions whilst we carry out these works, but will be working closely with our traffic management supplier to ensure this is kept to a minimum."
Allestree councillor Ged Potter said: "The work is needed. Markeaton Lane gets regualrly flooded. They are also going to rebuild a parapet which has been knocked down because of several cars going through it in recent years.
A spokesperson for Derby City Council said: “Works are being undertaken on Markeaton Lane at the entrance to Scarsdale Vets to introduce additional road drainage which will allow flood water to drain more effectively during heavy rainfall and following a river flood event. The location sits at a low point where water naturally gathers, so this location is a priority to ensure safety and availability of the highway.
“These works commence on Monday 4th November 2024 and will take up to three weeks to complete. During this time there will be a traffic signal controlled lane closure to protect the workforce and road users.
“There is also a road closure for bridge parapet renewal works on The Markeaton Brook bridge taking place this week (4th-8th November 2024) for which there is a road closure in place. The drainage works have been timed to coincide with this to take advantage of significantly reduced traffic flows across this location for the first week of works.”
We send out the biggest stories in an email every day. Sign up for the main Derbyshire Live newsletter here.
The controversial demolition of offices for a new Leicestershire Lidl store is well under way. Work has begun to flatten the site of Ashfield House in Ashby for the new supermarket, but the move has long sparked fury and concern with residents.The new “clean and contemporary” Lidl store, which will be within a stone's throw of Ashby's existing Tesco, Aldi and ...
The controversial demolition of offices for a new Leicestershire Lidl store is well under way. Work has begun to flatten the site of Ashfield House in Ashby for the new supermarket, but the move has long sparked fury and concern with residents.
The new “clean and contemporary” Lidl store, which will be within a stone's throw of Ashby's existing Tesco, Aldi and M&S stores, will create 40 jobs. Planning officers at North West Leicestershire District Council (NWLDC) approved the store and the offices' demolition in September despite concern from residents and several councillors.
The Resolution Road scheme has long proven unpopular with residents, some of whom have said they fear the Lidl would lead to traffic “paralysis ” in the area. Others questioned whether the site was the best location for the store, with some suggesting Ashby’s Money Hill development as an alternative.
READ MORE: Developer launches bid to turn 20 holiday lodges into homes
However, Lidl’s agents, Rapleys, claimed throughout the planning process that the site was the only “viable” location for the store. The store will take the place of the former offices after Lidl and Rapleys said there was “lack of demand” in retaining them.
NWLDC had previously challenged that claim, but U-turned earlier this year, finding that the loss of Ashfield House was “regrettable” but ultimately “reasonable”. New images from the site this week have revealed progress on the demolition with sections of the former office's rear already torn down, with demolition crews continuing on site.
A completion date on the demolition is unclear at this stage. Lidl have not provided an expeted opening date for the new store.
We are now bringing you the latest updates on WhatsApp first